A Prudent Pundit

“Come to me, all you who labor and are burdened, and I will give you rest. Take my yoke upon you and learn from me, for I am meek and humble of heart; and you will find rest for yourselves.”

That was our Lord, via the Apostle Matthew (11:28-29). But you could hear this message echoing recently in the unlikeliest of places: Sunday-morning television.

It came as a shock to many people, because it was spoken not by a televangelist, but by a regular on a Sunday news show. On FOX News Sunday, during a panel discussion capping the year that was, Brit Hume, former White House reporter for ABC and longtime Fox News anchor and commentator, was asked to comment on Tiger Woods’s serial and now public unfaithfulness to his wife.

What Hume dared to say was what you say when you look at the man in the news as a human being. Addressing the golf star’s future, Hume said: “Tiger Woods will recover as a golfer. Whether he can recover as a person I think is a very open question, and it’s a tragic situation with him. I think he’s lost his family. It’s not clear to me that – whether he’ll be able to have a relationship with his children.

“But,” he continued, “the Tiger Woods that emerges once the news value dies out of this scandal – the extent to which he can recover, it seems to me, depends on his faith. He’s said to be a Buddhist. I don’t think that faith offers the kind of forgiveness and redemption that is offered by the Christian faith. So my message to Tiger would be, ‘Tiger, turn to the Christian faith and you can make a total recovery and be a great example to the world.’”

Shocked, of course, are a whole host of jaded or ideologically committed voices. The host of MSNBC’s Countdown with Keith Olbermann announced that what Hume said “crosses that principle [of keeping] religious advocacy out of public life, since, you know, the worst examples of that are jihadists, not to mention, you know, guys who don’t know their own religions or somebody else’s religion, like Brit Hume.”

Brit Hume and the jihadists. I wish I could tell you no one takes this stuff seriously, but you know better than that. Mainstream reporters and the president of the United States have appeared on the show. But one has come to expect this of media ideologues. The more disturbing reality of life in our fallen world is: It’s not just those who spend their days immersed in ideology and ratings who reacted this way. In the more than a week since the incident occurred, I’ve heard non-pundit, faithful, church-going people buy into the conventional view: Hume said something wrong.

But Hume did nothing of the sort. What he did was approach cultural commentary as a child of God. Punditry requires prudence, but if we do believe what we say we do as Christians, if we take it seriously, we are going to look a little unsophisticated now and again to the MSNBC crowd.

One doesn’t have to look far to be reminded of this, and to be urged to do exactly what Hume did – to present the offer we all have as a fact. What he did was introduce into the discussion an age-old, historic solution in which many have found solace: the redemptive power of the Cross.

If you believe this, why not offer it at a prudent moment on a Sunday-morning talk show? The invitation has more authority and guarantee behind it than any political analysis, or any guess about Tiger Woods’s future.

At some point Brit Hume has likely come upon the passage, “Amen, I say to you, whoever does not accept the kingdom of God like a child will not enter it.” It appears he may have internalized it. And so, really, that’s the only worthwhile advice he had to offer Tiger Woods.

In an interview with Christianity Today, Hume said, “I was kind of hoping that in some way word of it might reach Tiger. I was hoping that people who were of faith might receive some encouragement from the message. You never know. I also thought it was interesting. I didn’t really sit down and make some kind of calculations on a sheet of lined paper about what were going to be the consequences. We were expressing our views and those were my views on that point.”

Watching the conventional wisdom that he did something wrong seep into the chattering class’s record, I picture St. Peter’s Church on Capitol Hill, which has exposition of the Blessed Sacrament on weekday evenings, a stone’s throw away from House office buildings. We chat and rally and fight. But in the end, it’s only His Word that will set things straight. This is the reality Brit Hume could not distance himself from on Sunday morning.


Kathryn Jean Lopez is editor-at-large of National Review Online and a nationally syndicated columnist. She can be e-mailed at

© 2010 The Catholic Thing. All rights reserved. For reprint rights, write to: info at thecatholicthing dot org

The Catholic Thing is a forum for intelligent Catholic commentary. Opinions expressed by writers are solely their own.

  • Willie

    Ama Deum et fac quod vis
    Wow! Love reading this piece. What a powerful witness.

  • Kathy

    Mr. Hume also reminded all of us of our Christian conscience and the fact that it is perfectly acceptable to measure behaviors based on our Faith and seek forgiveness in God’s mercy. Christians can and should voice their opinions based on belief in the public forum, and not shrink from the fear that their opinion will offend. Truth is never offensive, and Mr. Hume’s comments were based on his own sincere Christian conviction. I applaud him for his courage and generosity.

  • William H. Phelan

    Unless you eat My Flesh..
    What a curious piece for this site. Who is Hume, an Episcopalian, to comment on someone else while wearing the mantle of “Christianity”? Hume is divorced and remarried. Does anyone say to him “Whosoever puts away his wife to marry another…”. He has never received Holy Communion. Does anyone say to him, “Unless you eat My Flesh….you shall not receive eternal life.”? Does not Hume have enough targets for comment in his own faith community which “blesses” same sex unions, etc.?

  • Chuck

    Mr. Hume you are my hero
    I am Catholic, painfully so. In my parish there are “pro-choice” katholiks and worse; Jesus is insulted by liturgical abuse, indifference to the holiness of God’s house, etc. Mr. Hume, it seems to me, gave testimony of Christ and offered God’s true healing to another human being. Sure Hume is not theologically perfect… but we in today’s Catholic Church are perhaps lacking what he shows daily: Christian integrity and courage. We need more like him in our Church. I’d make him a bishop any day.

  • Jacob

    Cast the First Stone, Mr. Phelan
    I have to remind you that hypocrites sometimes give the best advice. Also would you say that St. Paul or perhaps St. Augustine (or any number of other saints) were without sin when they began preaching the Gospel? If your logic prevailed there wouldn’t be anyone in the world with enough credibility to say or do anything…breathing would be pretentious because technically none of us deserve it. Your comment about Episcopalians is equally as banal..should we Catholics give up too?

  • Dan

    I believe that what Mr. Hume said was motivated by love. You cannot say the same about 99% of the tens of thousands of other things that have said about the Tiger Woods scandal. Most of the other commentary has been smug condemnation, not at all dissimilar from the Pharisee’s condemnation of the adulterous woman.

  • William H. Phelan

    A Nation of Advice Givers
    Jacob, by what right does Brit Hume or Larry Kudlow give PUBLIC advice to Tiger Woods, a person they may have never met? By what right do you, someone whom I have never met, presume to insinuate that I might be a hypocrite? The Catholic Thing is a forum for intelligent Catholic commentary. Read the Post Script above. The fact that comments from bloggers such as you fall short of that standard, does not reflect on The Catholic Thing nor on me.

  • John

    Yes, Brit Hume committed the heinous crime of saying what he believes is true and what every Christian should believe; that the answer to the deepest human misery and the greatest hope of man is Jesus Christ. He also said what any scholar should be able to discern and most simple people do discern when not fogged by ideological mists: that Christianity and Buddhism represent two alternatives answers. Most pundits, I believe, do not seem to care what is true, no matter how stridently they opine.